Rovi Guides, Inc. v. Telus Corporation, 2024 FCA 126
Justice Stratas; Justice Gleason; Justice Monaghan - 2024-08-06
Read full decision. Automatically generated summary:
The appellant, Rovi, appeals from the judgment of the Federal Court in 2022 FC 1388. In that judgment, the Federal Court dismissed Rovi’s actions against the respondents, Bell and Telus for patent infringement and granted the respondents’ counterclaims for declarations of invalidity and non?infringement ... For the reasons that follow, I find that the Federal Court did not make any reviewable errors in its obviousness analysis in respect of the 870 Patent or in its anticipation analysis concerning the 585 Patent. Therefore, it is unnecessary to address its findings on the obviousness of the 585 Patent. However, like in Videotron, some of the Federal Court’s provisional findings regarding remedy require correction by this Court. The required correction does not affect the disposition of this appeal, which I would dismiss with costs.
Decision relates to:
- A-186-22 - ROVI GUIDES, INC. v. VIDEOTRON LTD. which is an appeal from 2022 FC 874 in T-921-17
- A-231-22 - ROVI GUIDES, INC. ET AL v. TELUS CORPORATION ET AL which is an appeal from 2022 FC 1388 in T-206-18
- A-233-22 - ROVI GUIDES, INC. ET AL v. BCE INC. ET AL which is an appeal from 2022 FC 1388 in T-113-18